25 Mar Seeing the Invisible
When Grief is Invisible
Sometimes grief wears an ‘invisibility cloak’, like Harry Potter, and people don’t recognise it. We may need to look closely and ask the right questions in order to find out what is present but appears invisible.
My father had a talent for seeing negative-space. I remember a family holiday in Scotland with my cousins. On arriving at the rambling rented farmhouse, my Dad deduced an absence of internal space. By moving wardrobes unobserved, he found a hidden room. Then he designed a treasure hunt, which revealed the discovery of the secret room as its triumphant end point.
Noticing Absence
This noticing, of what is present but appears absent is particularly helpful when exploring emotional landscapes. I imagine putting on my ‘grief spectacles’ to help me see what might not be apparent to the casual observer.
Absences can be obvious if we pay attention to what or who is not in the room. We might ask, “Which feelings are welcome here?” or “Which demographics aren’t here?” Absences can also be hard to detect. It’s not easy to see what has been persistently absent, or what has never been invited in at all. My sense is that the narrower our experience of difference, the harder it may be to detect what has been normalised and what is not visible.
In the terrain of grief, absence can be a provocation for grief as the source of unmet needs. I am an attention seeker. I am usually happy to perform, to speak in public, to dress up. This comes in part from my own unmet childhood development needs. I was an only child with a bipolar mother. I experienced her lack of attention – as a result of her depression – as neglect. I longed for attention. Instead, we often shared ‘proximal separation’ as Gabor Maté describes a care-giver who is nearby but not able to give attuned presence.
Now I see this as grief, or longing for what wasn’t available. In Francis Weller’s framework, this touches both on ‘The places that did not receive love’, and ‘What I expected but did not receive’, (his second and fourth Gates of Grief).
When Grief Is Unwelcome
For those who are processing the death of a loved one, there is often a pervasive sense that talking about the experience of grief is not welcome – or only in limited ways for a limited time period. In this way, speaking about death is often relegated to private spaces with a caring professional. In addition, there is often an assumption that we can only express grief in ways that are deemed acceptable (rather than the wild waves that unpredictably surge with rage, loud sounds, responses like unexpected changes in sexual desire, and other intense emotions). The reality is that grief may feel unwelcome at best or totally taboo at worst. In this way, grief may become ‘disenfranchised’. As a result, your grief may be at least removed from others’ direct gaze, if not invisible.
Invisible Sources of Grief
So, imagine if the source of your emotional turbulence is not the most recognised and acceptable reason to grieve – the death of a loved one. If bereavement is not the source of your emotional roller-coaster, how does it feel if the very real and natural symptoms of grief that you are experiencing, don’t fit neatly into the ‘recently bereaved’ category? What does it feel like, for example, if you have had a miscarriage, and you didn’t announce your pregnancy, so no-one sees your loss?
Disenfranchised Grief
There are infinite reasons to grieve. Many do not include bereavement, (and if someone you love has died that is an excellent reason to grieve). Ken Doka helpfully coined the term ‘disenfranchised grief’ to describe an unrecognised or hidden source of heart-break or grief. Examples include:
- The loss of someone you love, when their next of kin do not recognise the role you played in their life.
- Separation from a lover where your relationship was not public.
- Loss of your home and established life, when you are choosing new circumstances.
- Grief as a result of involuntary childlessness.
- The life choices you regret.
- The life unlived when ageing or facing chronic ill health.
- The loss of a meaningful attachment figure that is not externally recognised, (such as your therapist, favourite pop icon, pet hamster or the tree you loved watching through your window being cut down to make room for the neighbour’s extension).
Ambiguous Loss
‘Ambiguous Loss’ is another term which I find helpful, to describe the particular shape of unexplained absence. Pauline Boss first used this term to describe the grief felt when someone is missing either physically or emotionally. Examples include:
- Someone is presumed dead but there is no body to mourn or explanation to give closure.
- Someone has disappeared without giving notice or being in contact.
- Not knowing why you were given up for adoption.
- Being ghosted at the end of a relationship for unknown reasons.
- A ‘misadventure’ that may or may not have been an accident.
- Waiting for the outcome of a court trial.
- Someone you love remains unresponsive but is still physically present.
Unacknowledged Grief
While every loss is worthy of grieving, it is not always possible to do so at the time of impact or injury. The processing of grief may need to wait until there is adequate space and holding to do so. Grief may be present but delayed thanks to our helpful defensive accommodations, which enable us to wait until it is safe enough to feel. Feelings may be exiled, completely out of awareness, or dissociated from until they are ‘touched and awakened’ (as Bonnie Badenoch says).
Sometimes the grieving parts of us, that are out of our awareness, are apparently invisible, but sensed through the symptoms or situations in which they are triggered. We may gradually become aware of the shape of absent parts of us. In extreme cases, this may be portrayed through Dissociative Identity Disorder, (described in Carolyn Spring’s book ‘Recovery is My Best Revenge’) where traumatised parts split off and become invisible until activated.
Including the Whole System
When thinking systemically, it is important to include all the parts of the whole system. There may be parts that are invisible or less easy to recognise. There may be parts within us that are concealed for self-protection, or to avoid risking more vulnerability than feels comfortable. We may judge ourselves, allowing our critical inner voices to keep us small and boxed in.
In families, communities and organisations, grief itself may be split off or excluded. Often there may be one or more family members who are carrying the unacknowledged grief unconsciously on behalf of others in the system. Working with a Family Constellations practitioner can be a really useful way to map a system in order to reveal dynamics which have been carried by people in the system without their knowing. Rose Jiggens describes this modality:
“Working this way opens up insights which could not be gained through talking alone. We get to sense, feel, see and know things that are otherwise unavailable.”
By teasing out what is in the energy field in a Constellation, it is possible to surface what has been hidden, return unwanted energetic gifts, resolve unconscious wounds and clear invisible dynamics. The ties that bind us frequently entangle us in systemic bonds as a consequence of grief and trauma. Constellations can be particularly helpful when we remain caught in repeating patterns and invisible directives that are organising the system but out of our awareness.
Seeing the Invisible
If I widen the frame to include all causes of grief – including bereavement and everything beyond that causes emotional suffering, and then put on my grief spectacles, what becomes visible? This lens makes it more likely to see individual pain, collective losses and cumulative hurts, and the intersecting relationships between them. Add in the lens of past impacts and future fears, to see a complex matrix of stimuli that cause grief.
To make the invisible visible requires listening to all of our feelings, the voices of others, seeking out the absent narratives and being curious about the experience of people who are different to ourselves, and may hold different perspectives.
Tending Grief
‘Grief becomes grievance’ when untended. When sorrow, or distress is left without adequate containment, or holding, so that it can be digested, a residue of the hurt remains. It is this legacy that may go on to cause further distress, whether to self or others. The old adage is activated, ‘hurt people hurt people.’
Grief Tending is a practice in which we welcome all kinds of grief, whether known or unknown. In order to include what is both visible and invisible in Grief Tending, we often pour water to acknowledge ‘what has been said’, and also include ‘what has been left unsaid’. When people express grief, there are often cumulative layers of undigested experience. It may only be possible to begin to move towards feelings or access the surface layer.
It requires work to see the invisible. Putting a wide frame in place, like the edge of a jigsaw puzzle, and filling in the things that we know allows the gaps, the unfamiliar, the unacknowledged and the untended pieces to reveal their shape. Each of these invisible places may need to be attended to. They may also help us to make sense of the whole picture.
Sarah Pletts is a Grief Tender and Artist who offers workshops in London and online, sharing rituals where grief on all themes is welcome. For more information about Grief Tending events see here.








